lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:00:10 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...nel.org, aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com, patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901 Hi Pavel, On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:11:09 +0200 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote: > > Unfortunately, rest of the world can reproduce the error, and it means > linux-next is useless for us. > > I'd expect you to drop the relevant tree from linux-next when the > error was reported. Clearly, those patches are unsuitable for 4.15, as > they are broken, so they should not be in linux-next. Andrew has asked me to drop the patches from linux-next today and I have done so. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists