linux-kernel - Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:00:10 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, pali.rohar@...il.com,
        sre@...nel.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux-next broken for 2 weeks was Re: n900 in next-20170901

Hi Pavel,

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:11:09 +0200 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, rest of the world can reproduce the error, and it means
> linux-next is useless for us.
> 
> I'd expect you to drop the relevant tree from linux-next when the
> error was reported. Clearly, those patches are unsuitable for 4.15, as
> they are broken, so they should not be in linux-next.

Andrew has asked me to drop the patches from linux-next today and I
have done so.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell