linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the staging tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170919060915.GA1628@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:09:15 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the staging tree

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 07:54:55AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Commits
> 
>   688a0206cfb8 ("staging: rtlwifi: fix parenthesis alignment")
>   85d309d53f7a ("staging: rtlwifi: use kcalloc instead of multiply")
>   f216f6cdeb1d ("staging: rtlwifi: remove unused functions")
> 
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their author.

Ugh, I totally missed that, Tobin, what went wrong here?

I can't go rewrite my tree, so I'll just accept this as an implicit "ok"
for these patches, any objection?

thanks,

greg k-h