[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170919063422.GJ5430@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:34:22 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.12 00/52] 4.12.14-stable review
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:22:36PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:10:54AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > NOTE: This is going to be the last 4.12.y kernel, after this one, this
> > branch is end-of-life, please move to the 4.13.y kernel tree at this
> > point in time.
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.12.14 release.
> > There are 52 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> Tested on our production hardware. There was no error in dmesg.
> Booted up fine, all functionality working.
What does "production hardware" mean, if I might ask?
Anyway, thanks for testing and letting me know.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists