[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170919122711.GA13388@krava>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:27:11 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/13] perf report: create real callchain entries for
inlined frames
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:54:51PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
SNIP
>
> -struct inline_node *dso__parse_addr_inlines(struct dso *dso, u64 addr);
> +// parse inlined frames for the given address
> +struct inline_node *dso__parse_addr_inlines(struct dso *dso, u64 addr,
> + struct symbol *sym);
> +// free resources associated to the inline node list
> void inline_node__delete(struct inline_node *node);
>
> +// insert the inline node list into the DSO, which will take ownership
> +void inlines__tree_insert(struct rb_root *tree, struct inline_node *inlines);
> +// find previously inserted inline node list
> +struct inline_node *inlines__tree_find(struct rb_root *tree, u64 addr);
> +// delete all nodes within the tree of inline_node s
> +void inlines__tree_delete(struct rb_root *tree);
nit, think we prefer the /* */ comment style
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists