linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170919152253.tvj3hheggrx4lgig@dell>
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:22:53 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:52:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:43:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > > > Change of plan.  It looks like there are deps.
> 
> > > > Unapplied.
> 
> > > The core stuff went in during the merge window, you should be able to
> > > wait for -rc1 or pick up the asoc-v4.14 tag.
> 
> > No, I mean patches; 3, 4, 5 and 7 depend on this file.
> 
> Right, but I'd have expected a pull request more than the patch being
> unapplied?

Normally I wait until all patches patches in the set have been
reviewed (the ASOC ones still have not), then ask the OP and the
other affected Maintainers how they want to deal with the patch.
Far more often than not, the the solution is just to take the set
through the MFD tree.

However, since this is a new driver, you can just take it with my:

Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog