[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0710af4-d414-1f2a-7d86-dd559a50171f@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:59:15 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: foundation-v8: Enable PSCI mode
On 18/09/17 17:12, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:38:32PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> Currently if the Foundation model is running ARM Trusted Firmware then
>> the kernel, which is configured to use spin tables, cannot start secondary
>> processors or "power off" the simulation.
>>
>> Add a couple of labels to the include file, and introduce a new .dts
>> file that uses these to override the enable-method.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
>
> This looks good, but has the unfortunate effect of leaving the
> (irrelevant) cpu-release-addr property in the PSCI dts files, as that's
> in the underlying dtsi file.
>
> Could we split spin-table / PSCI parts into separate dtsi files?
>
> e.g. have:
>
> * foundation-v8.dtsi
> * foundation-v8-gicv{2,3}.dtsi
> * foundation-v8-{psci,spin-table}.dtsi
>
> ... and then combine those to build the dts files we want.
Will do.
>
> FWIW, with that:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Talking about what we want... if it's all split out I might as well add
a gicv2+psci DT as well. Will that still retain your Acked-by or do you
want to see it first ;-) ?
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists