[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170919160422.l7lxmfl6yrjnpalb@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:04:22 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Normally I wait until all patches patches in the set have been
> reviewed (the ASOC ones still have not), then ask the OP and the
I've been fine with them for ages.
> other affected Maintainers how they want to deal with the patch.
> Far more often than not, the the solution is just to take the set
> through the MFD tree.
It really helps if we can get the earlier parts of the series moving
even if the rest of it's in review still - I know I back off on
reviewing things if it looks like their dependencies aren't making
progress.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists