linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 0/6] Time based packet transmission

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:46:15 +0200
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Cc:     Richard Cochran <rcochran@...utronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com>,
        Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 0/6] Time based packet transmission

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:43:02PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> If I understand it correctly, this also allows us to make a PTP/NTP
> "one-step" clock with HW that doesn't support it directly.

Cool, yeah, I hadn't thought of that, but it would work...

Thanks,
Richard