[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o9q65ynq.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:30:33 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] brown paper bag fix for SIGPOLL si_codes
Linus,
Please pull the for-linus branch from the git tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git for-linus
HEAD: 54640d238760a1a54dfebe039b49682522100186 fcntl: Don't set si_code to SI_SIGIO when sig == SIGPOLL
When sorting out the si_code ambiguity fcntl I accidentally overshot and
included SIGPOLL as well. Ooops! This is my trivial fix for that.
Vince Weaver caught this when it landed in your tree with his
perf_event_tests many of which started failing because the si_code changed.
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:51:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] fcntl: Don't set si_code to SI_SIGIO when sig == SIGPOLL
When fixing things to avoid ambiguous cases I had a thinko
and included SIGPOLL/SIGIO in with all of the other signals
that have signal specific si_codes. Which is completely wrong.
Fix that.
Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
fs/fcntl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
index 0491da3b28c3..448a1119f0be 100644
--- a/fs/fcntl.c
+++ b/fs/fcntl.c
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ static void send_sigio_to_task(struct task_struct *p,
* specific si_codes. In that case use SI_SIGIO instead
* to remove the ambiguity.
*/
- if (sig_specific_sicodes(signum))
+ if ((signum != SIGPOLL) && sig_specific_sicodes(signum))
si.si_code = SI_SIGIO;
/* Make sure we are called with one of the POLL_*
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists