[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170919175823.51e3413d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:58:23 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] blktrace: Fix potentail deadlock between delete
& sysfs ops
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:41:35 -0700
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> Call it blk_trace mutex and move it right next to the blk_trace
> structure:
>
> ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE
> struct blk_trace *blk_trace;
> struct mutex blk_trace_mutex;
> #endif
>
> which makes it completely obvious to any read what you are protecting
> with it.
As a 1000ft away bystander, this appears to be the most logical
solution.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists