linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate fwnode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170920083429.GU4630@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:34:29 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     john.hubbard@...il.com,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate
 fwnode_operations

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:39:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Do we really ever pass anything other than struct acpi_device to
> ACPI_COMPANION_SET() as the second arg?

No, and we should not accept anything else than acpi_device either.