[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFr+A-Zs9RRUFx6LO2rYGw4FTMMA_jH_NWL3iENdYgez0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:00:22 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@...disk.com>,
Mateusz Nowak <mateusz.nowak@...el.com>,
Yuliy Izrailov <Yuliy.Izrailov@...disk.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
Das Asutosh <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>,
Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
Harjani Ritesh <riteshh@...eaurora.org>,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 01/14] mmc: core: Introduce host claiming by context
On 13 September 2017 at 13:40, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
> Currently the host can be claimed by a task. Change this so that the host
> can be claimed by a context that may or may not be a task. This provides
> for the host to be claimed by a block driver queue to support blk-mq, while
> maintaining compatibility with the existing use of mmc_claim_host().
As stated earlier, I think this is a good approach, which allows us to
move forward.
Some comments below, most related how to avoid us from adding more
wrapper functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/mmc/core/core.h | 6 ++++
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 7 +++-
> 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 66c9cf49ad2f..09fdc467b804 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -832,9 +832,38 @@ unsigned int mmc_align_data_size(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int sz)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_align_data_size);
>
> +/*
> + * Allow claiming an already claimed host if the context is the same or there is
> + * no context but the task is the same.
> + */
> +static inline bool mmc_ctx_matches(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ctx *ctx,
> + struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return host->claimer == ctx ||
> + (!ctx && task && host->claimer->task == task);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void mmc_ctx_set_claimer(struct mmc_host *host,
> + struct mmc_ctx *ctx,
> + struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + if (!host->claimer) {
> + if (ctx)
> + host->claimer = ctx;
> + else
> + host->claimer = &host->default_ctx;
> + }
> + if (task)
> + host->claimer->task = task;
> +}
> +
> /**
> - * __mmc_claim_host - exclusively claim a host
> + * __mmc_ctx_task_claim_host - exclusively claim a host
> * @host: mmc host to claim
> + * @ctx: context that claims the host or NULL in which case the default
> + * context will be used
> + * @task: task that claims the host or NULL in which case @ctx must be
> + * provided
> * @abort: whether or not the operation should be aborted
> *
> * Claim a host for a set of operations. If @abort is non null and
> @@ -842,7 +871,8 @@ unsigned int mmc_align_data_size(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int sz)
> * that non-zero value without acquiring the lock. Returns zero
> * with the lock held otherwise.
> */
> -int __mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, atomic_t *abort)
> +static int __mmc_ctx_task_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ctx *ctx,
> + struct task_struct *task, atomic_t *abort)
> {
> DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -856,7 +886,7 @@ int __mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, atomic_t *abort)
> while (1) {
> set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> stop = abort ? atomic_read(abort) : 0;
> - if (stop || !host->claimed || host->claimer == current)
> + if (stop || !host->claimed || mmc_ctx_matches(host, ctx, task))
> break;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> schedule();
> @@ -865,7 +895,7 @@ int __mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, atomic_t *abort)
> set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> if (!stop) {
> host->claimed = 1;
> - host->claimer = current;
> + mmc_ctx_set_claimer(host, ctx, task);
> host->claim_cnt += 1;
> if (host->claim_cnt == 1)
> pm = true;
> @@ -879,8 +909,19 @@ int __mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, atomic_t *abort)
>
> return stop;
> }
> +
> +int __mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, atomic_t *abort)
> +{
> + return __mmc_ctx_task_claim_host(host, NULL, current, abort);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mmc_claim_host);
There is currently only two users of __mmc_claim_host().
Instead of adding yet another layer of wrapper functions, let's keep
the existing __mmc_claim_host(), but change its definition to take the
new parameters. Then change the existing two users.
>
> +void mmc_ctx_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + __mmc_ctx_task_claim_host(host, ctx, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_ctx_claim_host);
There is no need to make this an exported function, better to keep it
static and only to core.c.
As a matter of fact, I suggest you remove this function altogether,
and just call __mmc_claim_host(), with the new parameters, from
mmc_ctx_get_card().
> +
> /**
> * mmc_release_host - release a host
> * @host: mmc host to release
> @@ -888,18 +929,17 @@ int __mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, atomic_t *abort)
> * Release a MMC host, allowing others to claim the host
> * for their operations.
> */
> -void mmc_release_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> +static void __mmc_release_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> if (--host->claim_cnt) {
> /* Release for nested claim */
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> } else {
> host->claimed = 0;
> + host->claimer->task = NULL;
> host->claimer = NULL;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> wake_up(&host->wq);
> @@ -907,8 +947,23 @@ void mmc_release_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(mmc_dev(host));
> }
> }
> +
> +void mmc_release_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(!host->claimed);
> +
> + __mmc_release_host(host);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_release_host);
>
> +void mmc_ctx_release_host(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(!host->claimed || host->claimer != ctx);
> +
> + __mmc_release_host(host);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_ctx_release_host);
>From the same reasoning as above, I think this should be converted to
a static function.
Or more preferably, remove it altogether, and just call
__mmc_release_host() from mmc_ctx_put_card().
> +
> /*
> * This is a helper function, which fetches a runtime pm reference for the
> * card device and also claims the host.
> @@ -921,6 +976,17 @@ void mmc_get_card(struct mmc_card *card)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_get_card);
>
> /*
> + * This is a helper function, which fetches a runtime pm reference for the
> + * card device and also claims the host for the mmc context.
> + */
> +void mmc_ctx_get_card(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&card->dev);
> + mmc_ctx_claim_host(card->host, ctx);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_ctx_get_card);
Again, please avoid adding yet another layer of wrapper functions.
Instead change the existing mmc_get_card() to take the parameter and
then change the existing three users of it.
> +
> +/*
> * This is a helper function, which releases the host and drops the runtime
> * pm reference for the card device.
> */
> @@ -933,6 +999,18 @@ void mmc_put_card(struct mmc_card *card)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_put_card);
>
> /*
> + * This is a helper function, which releases the host and drops the runtime
> + * pm reference for the card device.
> + */
> +void mmc_ctx_put_card(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + mmc_ctx_release_host(card->host, ctx);
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&card->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&card->dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_ctx_put_card);
Ditto.
> +
> +/*
> * Internal function that does the actual ios call to the host driver,
> * optionally printing some debug output.
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
> index ca861091a776..a294c836a143 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
> @@ -144,4 +144,10 @@ static inline void mmc_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> __mmc_claim_host(host, NULL);
> }
>
> +void mmc_ctx_claim_host(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ctx *ctx);
> +void mmc_ctx_release_host(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ctx *ctx);
> +
> +void mmc_ctx_get_card(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_ctx *ctx);
> +void mmc_ctx_put_card(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_ctx *ctx);
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> index f3f2d07feb2a..228a493c3b25 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> @@ -255,6 +255,10 @@ struct mmc_supply {
> struct regulator *vqmmc; /* Optional Vccq supply */
> };
>
> +struct mmc_ctx {
> + struct task_struct *task;
> +};
> +
> struct mmc_host {
> struct device *parent;
> struct device class_dev;
> @@ -388,8 +392,9 @@ struct mmc_host {
> struct mmc_card *card; /* device attached to this host */
>
> wait_queue_head_t wq;
> - struct task_struct *claimer; /* task that has host claimed */
> + struct mmc_ctx *claimer; /* context that has host claimed */
> int claim_cnt; /* "claim" nesting count */
> + struct mmc_ctx default_ctx; /* default context */
>
> struct delayed_work detect;
> int detect_change; /* card detect flag */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists