linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] [media] go7007: Use common error handling code in s2250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170920091250.rmrdilesv754sddi@mwanda>
Date:   Wed, 20 Sep 2017 12:12:50 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] [media] go7007: Use common error handling code in
 s2250_probe()

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:09:16AM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> @@ -555,17 +553,13 @@ static int s2250_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >>  	/* initialize the audio */
> >>  	if (write_regs(audio, aud_regs) < 0) {
> >>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "error initializing audio\n");
> >> -		goto fail;
> >> +		goto e_io;
> > 
> > Preserve the error code.
> 
> Do you suggest then to adjust the implementation of the function "write_regs"
> so that a more meaningful value would be used instead of the failure indication "-1"?
> 

If you want to, yeah, that would be good.

regards,
dan carpenter