[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170920091829.wftbjshog3ixvpmu@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:18:29 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] atmel_flexcom: Support backup mode
On 20/09/2017 at 10:30:31 +0200, Romain Izard wrote:
> 2017-09-19 17:25 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>:
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/09/2017 at 16:04, Romain Izard wrote:
> >> > The controller used by a flexcom module is configured at boot, and left
> >> > alone after this. As the configuration will be lost after backup mode,
> >> > restore the state of the flexcom driver on resume.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> >> On sama5d2 Xplained board (i2c0 from flexcom 4).
> >> and obviously:
> >> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks Romain!
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/mfd/atmel-flexcom.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > This is the first time I've seen this patch. Why's that?
> >
>
> As the patchset covers many subsystems, get_maintainers.pl provided a
> very long list of both developpers and mailing lists (28). I thought it
> was a good idea to shorten it a little. Bad idea. Sorry.
>
I think the correct way of handling that would have been to send each
patch to the proper subsystem as there are no dependency here.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists