[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878th9lhpe.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:42:21 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][DLPAR CPU][Oops] Bad kernel stack pointer
Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Dynamic CPU remove operation resulted in Kernel Panic on today's
> next-20170915 kernel.
>
> Machine Type: Power 7 PowerVM LPAR
> Kernel : 4.13.0-next-20170915
> config : attached
> test: DLPAR CPU remove
>
>
> dmesg logs:
> ----------
> cpu 37 (hwid 37) Ready to die...
> cpu 38 (hwid 38) Ready to die...
> cpu 39 (hwid 39)
> ******* RTAS CReady to die...
> ALL BUFFER CORRUPTION *******
Cool. Does that come from RTAS itself? I have never seen that happen
before.
Is this easily reproducible?
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists