[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170920163324.GB502@tigerII.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:33:24 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning
On (09/21/17 01:29), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
> dereference is required.
>
> checkpatch warning example:
>
> WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF'
weird... somehow I sent this patch twice. please ignore this one.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists