[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e39ef18-3e60-8cc9-ec4f-1cd02ade171f@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:46:24 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for clang
On 09/20/17 10:38, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> I think we need just the frame itself and RSP pointing below this
> frame. If we don't have a frame, CALL instruction will smash whatever
> RSP happens to point to. Compiler doesn't have to setup RSP to point
> below used part of stack in leaf functions.
>
In the kernel it does. Redzoning is not allowed in the kernel, because
interrupts or exceptions would also smash the redzone.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists