[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0665fe7-fc57-7795-3cee-f33cd806b850@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:14:49 +0200
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...isc-linux.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate
%pF/%pf printk specifiers
On 20.09.2017 18:29, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> This patch set attempts to move ia64/ppc64/parisc64 C function
> pointer ABI details out of printk() to arch code. Function dereference
> code now checks if a pointer belongs to a .opd ELF section and dereferences
> that pointer only if it does. The kernel and modules have their own .opd
> sections that's why I use two different ARCH functions: for kernel and
> for module pointer dereference.
> ...> *** A BIG NOTE ***
> I don't own ia64/ppc64/parisc64 hardware, so the patches are not
> tested. Sorry about that!
I just now tested your patch series successfully on parisc64.
You may add to the whole series:
Tested-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de> # parisc64
> Another note:
> I need to check what is BPF symbol lookup and do we need to
> do any dereference there.
Not relevant for parisc, since we don't support it yet.
Helge
Powered by blists - more mailing lists