linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Support glibc 2.26 siginfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8db4b452-08d1-fb48-2539-e7a2a573fadb@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:42:25 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Support glibc 2.26 siginfo_t.h

On 09/20/2017 04:02 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:32:46PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>> The 2.26 release of glibc changed how siginfo_t is defined, and the earlier
>>>> work-around to using the kernel definition are no longer needed. The old
>>>> way needs to stay around for a while, though.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
>>>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>>>> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
>>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Seth, can you double check this to confirm it works for you too? This builds
>>>> and tests correctly for me on both Ubuntu 17.10 (-proposed) with glibc 2.26
>>>> and with earlier distros with 2.24, etc.
>>>
>>> It builds and tests correctly for me too, with both glibc 2.26 and 2.24.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
>>
>> Awesome, thanks!
>>
>> Shuah, is it possible to land this for v4.14? If it has to wait,
>> that's probably okay, as I've marked it for -stable, so it'll get
>> where it needs to be eventually. :)
> 
> Friendly ping, Shuah, are you able to take this?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Kees
> 

Yes I can this into 4.14-rc2 or rc3. Thanks for the ping.

-- Shuah