[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170921074351.GC773@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:43:51 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning
On (09/20/17 11:24), Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 19:53 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
[..]
> > Is it worth to mention, that it's still needed in older kernels?
> > Just in case some patch get's backported.
good question.
> I think probably not.
>
> There are relatively few references and
> modifications are unlikely to be backported.
I tend to agree.
unlikely anyone backports printk message updates. I have quickly glanced
through stable-4.9 and haven't seen such backports. well, may be there
are some.
can tweak the warning a bit, probably. e.g. "if you are planning to
backport your change to kernels older than 4.14 then ignore this
warning". but not sure if it's worth it.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists