linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: add encapsulation kvm_vcpu_pi_need

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <59C37579.8010308@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:16:57 +0800
From:   "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@...wei.com>
To:     Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
CC:     <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: add encapsulation kvm_vcpu_pi_need_handle

Hi Peng,

There are two bugs in current code and Paolo already fixed them, please see:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg150896.html

-- 
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)

On 2017/9/21 23:14, Peng Hao wrote:

> use kvm_vcpu_pi_need_handle encapsulation simply coede
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 4253ade..26b99f4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -559,6 +559,13 @@ static inline int pi_test_sn(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
>  			(unsigned long *)&pi_desc->control);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool kvm_vcpu_pi_need_handle(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm) &&
> +		irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP)  &&
> +		kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu);
> +}
> +
>  struct vcpu_vmx {
>  	struct kvm_vcpu       vcpu;
>  	unsigned long         host_rsp;
> @@ -2202,9 +2209,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_pi_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
>  	struct pi_desc old, new;
>  	unsigned int dest;
>  
> -	if (!kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm) ||
> -		!irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP)  ||
> -		!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> +	if (!kvm_vcpu_pi_need_handle(vcpu))
>  		return;
>  
>  	do {
> @@ -2323,9 +2328,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_pi_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct pi_desc *pi_desc = vcpu_to_pi_desc(vcpu);
>  
> -	if (!kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm) ||
> -		!irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP)  ||
> -		!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> +	if (!kvm_vcpu_pi_need_handle(vcpu))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* Set SN when the vCPU is preempted */
> @@ -11691,9 +11694,7 @@ static int pi_pre_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	struct pi_desc old, new;
>  	struct pi_desc *pi_desc = vcpu_to_pi_desc(vcpu);
>  
> -	if (!kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm) ||
> -		!irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP)  ||
> -		!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> +	if (!kvm_vcpu_pi_need_handle(vcpu))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	vcpu->pre_pcpu = vcpu->cpu;
> @@ -11769,9 +11770,7 @@ static void pi_post_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	unsigned int dest;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	if (!kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm) ||
> -		!irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP)  ||
> -		!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> +	if (!kvm_vcpu_pi_need_handle(vcpu))
>  		return;
>  
>  	do {
> @@ -11831,9 +11830,7 @@ static int vmx_update_pi_irte(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
>  	struct vcpu_data vcpu_info;
>  	int idx, ret = -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (!kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(kvm) ||
> -		!irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP) ||
> -		!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(kvm->vcpus[0]))
> +	if (!kvm_vcpu_pi_need_handle(kvm->vcpus[0]))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->irq_srcu);


-- 
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)