[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYeOgyS45V8xWFy0OTdrb-h-xfy6X=q6BPv3uqO-1KxNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:37:16 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][pinctrl-next] pinctrl/amd: make functions
amd_gpio_suspend and amd_gpio_resume static
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The functions amd_gpio_suspend and amd_gpio_resume are local to the
> source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'amd_gpio_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
> symbol 'amd_gpio_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Patch applied with Daniel's review tag.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists