[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEccXeetHpF=y8z+8OMD6vX16B-8=7cpSNxHFjxoyeO-s+NNwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:49:40 +0100
From: Martyn Welch <martyn@...chs.me.uk>
To: Janani Sankara Babu <jananis37@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...il.com>, antonl1911@...il.com,
Ricardo Silva <rjpdasilva@...il.com>,
devel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:vme Fix use BIT macro
On 21 September 2017 at 06:52, Janani Sankara Babu <jananis37@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch is created to solve the following warning shown by the checkpatch
> script Warning: Replace all occurences of (1<<x) by BIT(x)
>
> Signed-off-by: Janani Sankara Babu <jananis37@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_pio2.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_pio2.h b/drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_pio2.h
> index ac4a4ba..e9c3cf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_pio2.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vme/devices/vme_pio2.h
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@
> PIO2_REGS_CTRL_WRD1 };
>
> #define PIO2_CNTR_SC_DEV0 0
> -#define PIO2_CNTR_SC_DEV1 (1 << 6)
> +#define PIO2_CNTR_SC_DEV1 BIT(6)
Sorry, these changes just don't make sense given the defines below.
> #define PIO2_CNTR_SC_DEV2 (2 << 6)
> #define PIO2_CNTR_SC_RDBACK (3 << 6)
>
> @@ -188,12 +188,12 @@
> PIO2_CNTR_SC_DEV1, PIO2_CNTR_SC_DEV2 };
>
> #define PIO2_CNTR_RW_LATCH 0
> -#define PIO2_CNTR_RW_LSB (1 << 4)
> +#define PIO2_CNTR_RW_LSB BIT(4)
> #define PIO2_CNTR_RW_MSB (2 << 4)
> #define PIO2_CNTR_RW_BOTH (3 << 4)
>
> #define PIO2_CNTR_MODE0 0
> -#define PIO2_CNTR_MODE1 (1 << 1)
> +#define PIO2_CNTR_MODE1 BIT(1)
> #define PIO2_CNTR_MODE2 (2 << 1)
> #define PIO2_CNTR_MODE3 (3 << 1)
> #define PIO2_CNTR_MODE4 (4 << 1)
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists