linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/5] x86/intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:08:15 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] x86/intel_rdt: Better diagnostics

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:18:38PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> 
> Chatting online with Boris to diagnose why his test cases for RDT
> weren't working, we came up with either a good idea (in which case
> I credit Boris) or a dumb one (in which case this is all my fault).

Ha! I can share the fault, no worries :-)

I'll test them on my box when I get a chance.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--