[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170921121344.movkcoj6rm2s23ig@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:13:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
Maged Michael <maged.michael@...il.com>, gromer@...gle.com,
Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] membarrier: Provide register expedited
private command
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 06:36:47PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> @@ -3373,6 +3362,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
>
> /* Also unlocks the rq: */
> rq = context_switch(rq, prev, next, &rf);
> + membarrier_arch_sched_in(prev, next);
That's wrong iirc; we just switched stacks, you cannot use @prev and
@next.
> } else {
> rq->clock_update_flags &= ~(RQCF_ACT_SKIP|RQCF_REQ_SKIP);
> rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists