lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:21:19 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] pinctrl: meson: clean pin offsets On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> wrote: > The initial goal of this series was move to TEST_N pin from the EE > controller to AO controller, where it belongs. This meant modify the > EE_OFF value. > > This offset is a quirk we brought from the vendor driver when it was > initially merged. There no reason to keep this around and we could simply > let pinctrl figure the pin base value. > > Removing this offset, while simple, ends up being quite a patch bomb. > This is why I split the change over 5 first patches, so the important > change, patch #1 remains visible. Of course, to avoid breaking bisect, > these first 5 patches should be squashed into one. (If you prefer that I > squash it myself, I may have to send you a PR as the patch would exceed > VGER 100000 characters limit) > > The last change is this series, while not directly related, also requires > to adjust the gpio-line-names property in DT. Having these changes going > together would make it easier to coordinate the DTS changes. > > This was changeset has been test on gxbb P200, gxl libretech-cc. It was > also boot tested on meson8 (Thx Martin!) > > Jerome Brunet (8): > pinctrl: meson: remove offset from pinctrl > pinctrl: meson: remove offset continued - gxbb > pinctrl: meson: remove offset continued - gxl > pinctrl: meson: remove offset continued - meson8 > pinctrl: meson: remove offset continued - meson8b > pinctrl: meson: get rid of pin_base > pinctrl: meson-gx: TEST_N belongs to the AO controller > pinctrl: meson-gxbb: add missing GPIOX_22 pin Looks good just waiting for review from Carlo && || Kevin. Yours, Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists