linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: staging: greybus: Release memory obtained by kasprintf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170921125918.keiog5yd2jw342zc@mwanda>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:59:18 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Cc:     rmfrfs@...il.com, johan@...nel.org, elder@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: staging: greybus: Release memory obtained by
 kasprintf

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:05:27PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> Free memory region, if gb_lights_channel_config is not successful.
> 

The question I have is do we free this on module unload?  I don't see
that we do.  I feel like we should do a free after calling
__gb_lights_led_unregister().  But that's awkward because we call
__gb_lights_led_unregister() when this function fails so it would end
up being a double free.

> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/light.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> index 3f4148c..b00d47c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/light.c
> @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static int gb_lights_channel_config(struct gb_light *light,
>  
>  	ret = channel_attr_groups_set(channel, cdev);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err;
>  
>  	gb_lights_led_operations_set(channel, cdev);
>  
> @@ -994,15 +994,18 @@ static int gb_lights_channel_config(struct gb_light *light,
>  	 * configurations.
>  	 */
>  	if (!is_channel_flash(channel))
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err;

"ret" is zero here.  This is actually a success return.  It would be
cleaner to just write "return 0;".  Anyway, this patch introduces a use
after free so that doesn't work.

Also it's better to choose a label name which says what the label does
so in this case it would be "goto err_free_name" or "goto err_cdev_name"
or whatever, but something to indicate that it's to do with freeing
the cdev->name.  Just "err" is too ambiguous.

>  
>  	light->has_flash = true;
>  
>  	ret = gb_lights_channel_flash_config(channel);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto err;
>  
>  	return ret;
        ^^^^^^^^^^
Here as well, change this from "return ret;" to "return 0;".

regards,
dan carpenter