linux-kernel - Re: gcc-8 objtool warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0u0J5K25Go+0fEdKYoANOZoxA1tG-cTqkXPFBgw1gVkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:27:37 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gcc-8 objtool warnings

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:43:31PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> -----
> From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup
>
> Arnd Bergmann reported a bunch of warnings like:
>
>   crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_fold_time()+0x3b: call without frame pointer save/setup
>   crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_stuck()+0x1d: call without frame pointer save/setup
>   crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_unbiased_bit()+0x15: call without frame pointer save/setup
>   crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_read_entropy()+0x32: call without frame pointer save/setup
>   crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_entropy_collector_free()+0x19: call without frame pointer save/setup
>
> and
>
>   arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: collect_events uses BP as a scratch register
>   arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: events_ht_sysfs_show()+0x22: call without frame pointer save/setup
>
> With certain rare configurations, GCC sometimes sets up the frame
> pointer with:
>
>   lea    (%rsp),%rbp
>
> instead of:
>
>   mov    %rsp,%rbp
>
> The instructions are equivalent, so treat the former like the latter.
>
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>

Confirmed, this fixes many configurations that had warnings before,
currently testing with gcc-6.3.

       Arnd