linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Use raw_cpu_ptr() instead of get_cpu_ptr() for ->flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170921151040.szekdgibvojrdzhf@linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:10:40 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Vinod Adhikary <vinadhy@...il.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Use raw_cpu_ptr() instead of get_cpu_ptr()
 for ->flush_queue

On 2017-09-11 22:22:11 [-0400], Vinod Adhikary wrote:
> Dear all,
Hi,

> Thank you for the great community support and support from Sebastian to
> provide me this patch. I wanted to send this email to inform you and
> perhaps get some information on how I could keep myself updated on updates
> in regards to linux-rt. I apologize if I'm spamming you with this email.

There is a rt-users mailing list, see
	https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/communication/mailinglists

> I noticed `Bug: Scheduling while atomic` on ahci after building 4.9 rt and
> reported the issue on oftc channel. Sebastian quickly helped me get a patch
> and my `journalctl -f` was clean without any such messages. Yesterday I
> decided to build 4.11 without the patch but I saw a whole bunch of similar
> bug logs not just on ahci but on my nic card as well among a few others.
> There were a few instances where I had to hard shutdown my machine. I
> patched 4.11 with Sebastian's patch again and so far it's been okay for
> about 24 hours and going.

It sounds like the same issue. I taking this for v4.11 RT and v4.9 will
pick it at some point.

> My concern is, how I can provide more information to resolve this issue,
> perhaps in the next release. Please let me know how I can be of help.

usually providing a backtrace like you did to the rt-usrs list is
enough.

> Thank you

Sebastian