[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170921151842.GB6579@krava>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:18:42 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] perf record: Record the first sample time and
last sample time to perf file header
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:12:32PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
SNIP
> @@ -2647,11 +2681,22 @@ int perf_file_header__read(struct perf_file_header *header,
>
> if (header->size != sizeof(*header)) {
> /* Support the previous format */
> - if (header->size == offsetof(typeof(*header), adds_features))
> + if (header->size == offsetof(typeof(*header), adds_features)) {
> bitmap_zero(header->adds_features, HEADER_FEAT_BITS);
> - else
> + header->first_sample_time = 0;
> + header->last_sample_time = 0;
> + format_feature = false;
> + format_time = false;
> + } else if (header->size == offsetof(typeof(*header),
> + first_sample_time)) {
> + header->first_sample_time = 0;
> + header->last_sample_time = 0;
> + format_time = false;
> + } else
ok, disregard my previou comment.. I should have read the full patch first ;-)
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists