[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170921151832.6rs4gx6cft6tfdis@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:18:32 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
timur@...i.org, nicoleotsuka@...il.com, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com,
fabio.estevam@....com, peter.ujfalusi@...com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Handle return value of
devm_kasprintf
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:50:03AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> devm_kasprintf() can fail here and we must check its return value.
This is patch 2/3 but you've only sent me this one patch. This is
missing the point of numbering a series, the only reason for the
numbering is to provide ordering within the series. If you send a patch
separately or as part of a different series then the numbering should
change to reflect how things are being sent.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists