linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 2/6] iommu/iova: Optimise the padding calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <69401ae633a0a869423eaf6b4ea61bc38a3e0e80.1506007392.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:52:43 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     joro@...tes.org
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com,
        nwatters@...eaurora.org, tomasz.nowicki@...iumnetworks.com,
        dwoods@...lanox.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/6] iommu/iova: Optimise the padding calculation

From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>

The mask for calculating the padding size doesn't change, so there's no
need to recalculate it every loop iteration. Furthermore, Once we've
done that, it becomes clear that we don't actually need to calculate a
padding size at all - by flipping the arithmetic around, we can just
combine the upper limit, size, and mask directly to check against the
lower limit.

For an arm64 build, this alone knocks 20% off the object code size of
the entire alloc_iova() function!

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Tested-by: Nate Watterson <nwatters@...eaurora.org>
[rm: simplified more of the arithmetic, rewrote commit message]
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
---

v5: No change

 drivers/iommu/iova.c | 42 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
index f129ff4f5c89..20be9a8b3188 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
@@ -182,24 +182,17 @@ iova_insert_rbtree(struct rb_root *root, struct iova *iova,
 	rb_insert_color(&iova->node, root);
 }
 
-/*
- * Computes the padding size required, to make the start address
- * naturally aligned on the power-of-two order of its size
- */
-static unsigned int
-iova_get_pad_size(unsigned int size, unsigned int limit_pfn)
-{
-	return (limit_pfn - size) & (__roundup_pow_of_two(size) - 1);
-}
-
 static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
 		unsigned long size, unsigned long limit_pfn,
 			struct iova *new, bool size_aligned)
 {
 	struct rb_node *prev, *curr = NULL;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	unsigned long saved_pfn;
-	unsigned int pad_size = 0;
+	unsigned long saved_pfn, new_pfn;
+	unsigned long align_mask = ~0UL;
+
+	if (size_aligned)
+		align_mask <<= fls_long(size - 1);
 
 	/* Walk the tree backwards */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
@@ -209,31 +202,26 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
 	while (curr) {
 		struct iova *curr_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node);
 
-		if (limit_pfn <= curr_iova->pfn_lo) {
+		if (limit_pfn <= curr_iova->pfn_lo)
 			goto move_left;
-		} else if (limit_pfn > curr_iova->pfn_hi) {
-			if (size_aligned)
-				pad_size = iova_get_pad_size(size, limit_pfn);
-			if ((curr_iova->pfn_hi + size + pad_size) < limit_pfn)
-				break;	/* found a free slot */
-		}
+
+		if (((limit_pfn - size) & align_mask) > curr_iova->pfn_hi)
+			break;	/* found a free slot */
+
 		limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo;
 move_left:
 		prev = curr;
 		curr = rb_prev(curr);
 	}
 
-	if (!curr) {
-		if (size_aligned)
-			pad_size = iova_get_pad_size(size, limit_pfn);
-		if ((iovad->start_pfn + size + pad_size) > limit_pfn) {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		}
+	new_pfn = (limit_pfn - size) & align_mask;
+	if (limit_pfn < size || new_pfn < iovad->start_pfn) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	/* pfn_lo will point to size aligned address if size_aligned is set */
-	new->pfn_lo = limit_pfn - (size + pad_size);
+	new->pfn_lo = new_pfn;
 	new->pfn_hi = new->pfn_lo + size - 1;
 
 	/* If we have 'prev', it's a valid place to start the insertion. */
-- 
2.13.4.dirty