linux-kernel - Re: Query regarding synchronize_sched_expedited and resched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170921163012.iqbjmqpijftsgpxu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:30:12 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
        josh@...htriplett.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sramana@...eaurora.org, prsood@...eaurora.org,
        pkondeti@...eaurora.org, markivx@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: Query regarding synchronize_sched_expedited and resched_cpu

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:00:48AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> commit c21c9b78182e35eb0e72ef4e3bba3054f26eaaea
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date:   Mon Sep 18 08:54:40 2017 -0700
> 
>     sched: Make resched_cpu() unconditional
>     
>     The current implementation of synchronize_sched_expedited() incorrectly
>     assumes that resched_cpu() is unconditional, which it is not.  This means
>     that synchronize_sched_expedited() can hang when resched_cpu()'s trylock
>     fails as follows (analysis by Neeraj Upadhyay):
>     
>     o	CPU1 is waiting for expedited wait to complete:
>     
>     	sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus
>     	     rdp->exp_dynticks_snap & 0x1   // returns 1 for CPU5
>     	     IPI sent to CPU5
>     
>     	synchronize_sched_expedited_wait
>     		 ret = swait_event_timeout(rsp->expedited_wq,
>     					   sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp_root),
>     					   jiffies_stall);
>     
>     	expmask = 0x20, CPU 5 in idle path (in cpuidle_enter())
>     
>     o	CPU5 handles IPI and fails to acquire rq lock.
>     
>     	Handles IPI
>     	     sync_sched_exp_handler
>     		 resched_cpu
>     		     returns while failing to try lock acquire rq->lock
>     		 need_resched is not set
>     
>     o    CPU5 calls  rcu_idle_enter() and as need_resched is not set, goes to
>          idle (schedule() is not called).
>     
>     o    CPU 1 reports RCU stall.


Inconsistent spacing after your bullet 'o', first two points have a
space the last two a tab or so.

>     Given that resched_cpu() is now used only by RCU, this commit fixes the
>     assumption by making resched_cpu() unconditional.

Other than that, yes looks _much_ better, thanks!

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

Also, you might want to tag it for stable.