[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <092f915e-609c-928a-78b5-a832588ee3a3@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:28:53 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xen.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgross@...e.com,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/13] xen/pvcalls: implement connect command
On 09/15/2017 07:00 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Send PVCALLS_CONNECT to the backend. Allocate a new ring and evtchn for
> the active socket.
>
> Introduce fields in struct sock_mapping to keep track of active sockets.
> Introduce a waitqueue to allow the frontend to wait on data coming from
> the backend on the active socket (recvmsg command).
>
> Two mutexes (one of reads and one for writes) will be used to protect
> the active socket in and out rings from concurrent accesses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
with a couple of nits below and comments from previous patch applicable
here.
> + bytes = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
> + PVCALLS_RING_ORDER);
I don't think the cast is needed.
> + map = (struct sock_mapping *) sock->sk->sk_send_head;
Space between cast and variable.
> + req = RING_GET_REQUEST(&bedata->ring, req_id);
> + req->req_id = req_id;
> + req->cmd = PVCALLS_CONNECT;
> + req->u.connect.id = (uint64_t)map;
> + memcpy(req->u.connect.addr, addr, sizeof(*addr));
Move this down (I don't think there are any dependencies)
> + req->u.connect.len = addr_len;
> + req->u.connect.flags = flags;
> + req->u.connect.ref = map->active.ref;
> + req->u.connect.evtchn = evtchn;
> +
-boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists