lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86vakbnofy.fsf@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:10:41 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:     Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, vz@...ia.com,
        slemieux.tyco@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] iirqchip: Handle return value of kasprintf

On Wed, Sep 20 2017 at  1:38:18 pm BST, Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com> wrote:
> kasprintf() can fail here and we must check its return value.

Or not. The use of these strings is purely cosmetic (they are only used
to display various debug information), and printk is perfectly able to
handle a NULL string.

Refusing to probe an essential piece of HW because a debug feature
failed seems at best counter-productive.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ