[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170922092621.uq2xsvxangeetewi@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:26:21 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] spi: fix spi-sprd-adi build errors when
SPI_SPRD_ADI=y and HWSPINLOCK=m
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:02:31AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> spi-sprd-adi.c:(.text+0x3ee): undefined reference to `__hwspin_unlock'
>
> v2: allow build with or without HWSPINLOCK, but restrict to =m
> if HWSPINLOCK=m.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Please put inter version changelogs after the --- as covered in
SubmittingPatches. This still seems like the stubs aren't doing the
right thing - if we can use hwspinlocks in a module when they're enabled
I'd expect to be able to build the stubs that way too.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists