lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02509904-4ae8-c6f8-3514-5f77d665c9a6@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:39:38 +0300
From:   Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To:     Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC:     <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dmaengine: Support for querying maximum trasnfer
 length (of an SG element)


Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

On 2017-09-21 20:14, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 01:44:22PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Certain DMA engines have limitation on the maximum size of a transfer they
>> can support. This size limitation is per SG element or for period length in
>> cyclic transfers.
>> In TI's eDMA and sDMA this limitation is not really a length limit, but it
>> is the number of bursts that we can support in one transfer.
>>
>> With this callback the DMA drivers can provide hints to clients on how they
>> should set up their buffers (sglist, cyclic buffer). Without this the
>> clients must have open coded workarounds in place for each and every DMA
>> engine they might be interfacing with to have correct length for the
>> transfers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/dmaengine.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
>> index 8319101170fc..739824b94c1b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
>> @@ -705,6 +705,9 @@ struct dma_filter {
>>   * @device_prep_dma_imm_data: DMA's 8 byte immediate data to the dst address
>>   * @device_config: Pushes a new configuration to a channel, return 0 or an error
>>   *	code
>> + * @device_get_max_len: Get the maximum supported length in bytes of a slave
>> + *	transfer based on the set dma_slave_config. The length limitation
>> + *	applies to each SG element's length.
>>   * @device_pause: Pauses any transfer happening on a channel. Returns
>>   *	0 or an error code
>>   * @device_resume: Resumes any transfer on a channel previously
>> @@ -792,6 +795,8 @@ struct dma_device {
>>  
>>  	int (*device_config)(struct dma_chan *chan,
>>  			     struct dma_slave_config *config);
>> +	u32 (*device_get_max_len)(struct dma_chan *chan,
>> +				  enum dma_transfer_direction dir);
>>  	int (*device_pause)(struct dma_chan *chan);
>>  	int (*device_resume)(struct dma_chan *chan);
>>  	int (*device_terminate_all)(struct dma_chan *chan);
>> @@ -812,6 +817,15 @@ static inline int dmaengine_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
>>  	return -ENOSYS;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline u32 dmaengine_slave_get_max_len(struct dma_chan *chan,
>> +					      enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
>> +{
>> +	if (chan->device->device_get_max_len)
>> +		return chan->device->device_get_max_len(chan, dir);
> 
> not another callback :)
> 
> on a serious note, why shouldn't this be one more capability in
> dma_slave_caps. looking at next patch it seems static

It is not really static, the size in bytes depends on the dev_width and
the maxburst:
dev_width * burst * (SZ_64K - 1);

The number of (dev_width * burst) is static, yes. Other DMA engines
might have similar interpretation, but returning the maximum length in
bytes sounded more generic for other engines to be able to adopt.

Initially I had maxburst_cnt in struct dma_device for maximum burst
count within one SG, but it felt clumsy and not too intuitive either.

- Péter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ