linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] sound: core: Avoid using timespec for struct snd_pcm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1QBpN6KdSYRX-T2H1gGxxoOWJAyPBwgZSaa1gw1LKkKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:14:55 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
        Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, dharageswari.r@...el.com,
        gudishax.kranthikumar@...el.com, guneshwor.o.singh@...el.com,
        hardik.t.shah@...el.com, jeeja.kp@...el.com,
        Naveen M <naveen.m@...el.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>,
        Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
        SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] sound: core: Avoid using timespec for struct snd_pcm_status

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:18:04 +0200,
> Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>> The struct snd_pcm_status will use 'timespec' type variables to record
>> timestamp, which is not year 2038 safe on 32bits system.
>>
>> Userspace will use SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_STATUS and SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_STATUS_EXT
>> as commands to issue ioctl() to fill the 'snd_pcm_status' structure in
>> userspace. The command number is always defined through _IOR/_IOW/IORW,
>> so when userspace changes the definition of 'struct timespec' to use
>> 64-bit types, the command number also changes.
>>
>> Thus in the kernel, we now need to define two versions of each such ioctl
>> and corresponding ioctl commands to handle 32bit time_t and 64bit time_t
>> in native mode:
>> struct snd_pcm_status32 {
>>       ......
>>       struct { s32 tv_sec; s32 tv_nsec; } trigger_tstamp;
>>       struct { s32 tv_sec; s32 tv_nsec; } tstamp;
>>       ......
>> }
>>
>> struct snd_pcm_status64 {
>>       ......
>>       struct { s64 tv_sec; s64 tv_nsec; } trigger_tstamp;
>>       struct { s64 tv_sec; s64 tv_nsec; } tstamp;
>>       ......
>> }
>
> I'm confused.  It's different from timespec64?  So 32bit user-space
> would need to use a new own-type timespec instead of the standard
> timespec that is compliant with y2038?

It's complicated:

The definition of 'timespec' that user space sees comes from glibc,
and while that currently uses the traditional '{ long tv_sec;
long tv_nsec; }' definition, it will have to change to something like
(still simplified):

#if __32BIT && __64_BIT_TIME_T
typedef long long time_t;
#else
typedef long time_t;
#endif
struct timespec {
        time_t tv_sec;
#if __BIG_ENDIAN && __32BIT && __64_BIT_TIME_T
        unsigned int :32;
#endif
       long tv_nsec;
#if __LITTLE_ENDIAN && __32BIT && __64_BIT_TIME_T
        unsigned int pad;
#endif
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));

which matches the layout that a 64-bit kernel uses, aside
from the nanosecond padding.

The kernel uses timespec64 internally, which is defined as
"{ s64 tv_sec; long tv_nsec };", so this has the padding
in a different place on big-endian architectures, and has a
different alignment and size on i386. We plan to introduce
a 'struct __kernel_timespec' that is compatible with the
__64_BIT_TIME_T version of the user timespec, but that
doesn't exist yet.

If you prefer, we can probably introduce it now with Baolin's
series, I think Deepa was planning to post a patch to add
it soon anyway.

       Arnd