lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:40:21 +0200
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
        Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC:     <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] ehci-atmel: Power down during suspend is normal

On 15/09/2017 at 16:04, Romain Izard wrote:
> When an Atmel SoC is suspended with the backup mode, the USB bus will be
> powered down. As this is expected, do not return an error to the driver
> core when ehci_resume detects it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> index 7440722bfbf0..2a8b9bdc0e57 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> @@ -205,7 +205,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused ehci_atmel_drv_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	struct atmel_ehci_priv *atmel_ehci = hcd_to_atmel_ehci_priv(hcd);
>  
>  	atmel_start_clock(atmel_ehci);
> -	return ehci_resume(hcd, false);
> +	ehci_resume(hcd, false);
> +	return 0;

Ok, I agree with that as the underlying function takes care about the
controller, in any case (even for !B+S-R case). So we don't have any
added value to propagate this information.

Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>

>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ