[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90b0ce5e-d99e-7bba-0e6e-3d375053487d@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:40:21 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
Josh Wu <rainyfeeling@...look.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] ehci-atmel: Power down during suspend is normal
On 15/09/2017 at 16:04, Romain Izard wrote:
> When an Atmel SoC is suspended with the backup mode, the USB bus will be
> powered down. As this is expected, do not return an error to the driver
> core when ehci_resume detects it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> index 7440722bfbf0..2a8b9bdc0e57 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c
> @@ -205,7 +205,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused ehci_atmel_drv_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct atmel_ehci_priv *atmel_ehci = hcd_to_atmel_ehci_priv(hcd);
>
> atmel_start_clock(atmel_ehci);
> - return ehci_resume(hcd, false);
> + ehci_resume(hcd, false);
> + return 0;
Ok, I agree with that as the underlying function takes care about the
controller, in any case (even for !B+S-R case). So we don't have any
added value to propagate this information.
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists