linux-kernel - Re: [media] spca500: Use common error handling code in spca500

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4921ea61-49cd-4071-e636-c199daddec8e@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:40:35 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [media] spca500: Use common error handling code in
 spca500_synch310()

>>  	return 0;
>> -error:
>> +
>> +report_failure:
>> +	PERR("Set packet size: set interface error");
>>  	return -EBUSY;
>>  }
> 
> Why change the label name?

I find the suggested variant a bi better.


> They are both equally uninformative.

Which identifier would you find appropriate there?

Regards,
Markus