[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r2uze5lp.wl-satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:10:10 +0900
From: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] brd: prevent overflow caused by too large rd_size parameter
The max value of rd_size parameter is ULONG_MAX from the following commit.
Commit 366f4aea649a65c3735d91b4409d84c771811290 ("brd: Switch rd_size
to unsigned long")
However, this parameter * 1024 will be set as inode->i_size corresponding
to brd devices and it's a signed value. To prevent overflow, this parameter
should be equal to or smaller than the max value of sector_t >> 11, 10 bits
are for 1024 and 1 bit is for sign bit.
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>
---
drivers/block/brd.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/drivers/block/brd.c
index 104b71c..2b00e7d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/brd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/brd.c
@@ -546,6 +546,14 @@ static int __init brd_init(void)
* dynamically.
*/
+ /*
+ * rd_size * 1024 will be set as its inode->i_size and it's a signed
+ * value. So rd_size should be equal to or smaller than the max value
+ * of sector_t >> 11, 10 bits are for 1024 and 1 bit is for sign bit.
+ */
+ if (rd_size >> (sizeof(sector_t) * 8 - 11))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (register_blkdev(RAMDISK_MAJOR, "ramdisk"))
return -EIO;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists