[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170922010811.GA20133@amt.cnet>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:08:13 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] KVM: x86: KVM_HC_RT_PRIO hypercall (host-side)
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 03:49:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 21/09/2017 15:32, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > So the guest can change the scheduling decisions at the host level?
> > And the host HAS to follow it? There is no policy override for the
> > host to say - nah, not going to do it?
In that case the host should not even configure the guest with this
option (this is QEMU's 'enable-rt-fifo-hc' option).
> > Also wouldn't the guest want to always be at SCHED_FIFO? [I am thinking
> > of a guest admin who wants all the CPU resources he can get]
No. Because in the following code, executed by the housekeeping vCPU
running at constant SCHED_FIFO priority:
1. Start disk I/O.
2. busy spin
With the emulator thread sharing the same pCPU with the housekeeping
vCPU, the emulator thread (which runs at SCHED_NORMAL), will never
be scheduled in in place of the vcpu thread at SCHED_FIFO.
This causes a hang.
> Yeah, I do not understand why there should be a housekeeping VCPU that
> is running at SCHED_NORMAL. If it hurts, don't do it...
Hope explanation above makes sense (in fact, it was you who pointed
out SCHED_FIFO should not be constant on the housekeeping vCPU,
when sharing pCPU with emulator thread at SCHED_NORMAL).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists