[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170923105318.fkjr5l5yx57jjaqe@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:53:18 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Miguel Bernal Marin <miguel.bernal.marin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: Fix inline asm call constraints for clang
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> Patch 1 is a bug fix for an objtool issue which was uncovered by patch 2.
>
> Patch 2 is the last fix needed for clang to be able to compile and boot
> the kernel.
>
> Josh Poimboeuf (2):
> objtool: Handle another GCC stack pointer adjustment bug
> x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for clang
Have these patches been boot tested with clang?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists