[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170924200853.GB26260@zzz.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:08:53 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] x86/fpu: Use validate_xstate_header() to validate
the xstate_header in sanitize_restored_xstate()
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 09:02:42PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 12:59:06PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > @@ -328,10 +331,8 @@ static int __fpu__restore_sig(void __user *buf, void __user *buf_fx, int size)
> > > err = copy_user_to_xstate(&fpu->state.xsave, buf_fx);
> > > } else {
> > > err = __copy_from_user(&fpu->state.xsave, buf_fx, state_size);
> > > -
> > > - /* xcomp_bv must be 0 when using uncompacted format */
> > > - if (!err && fpu->state.xsave.header.xcomp_bv)
> > > - err = -EINVAL;
> > > + if (!err)
> > > + err = validate_xstate_header(&fpu->state.xsave.header);
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, this is the buggy part. The problem is that this code runs even if XSAVE
> > isn't being used --- and in that case the state size is 512 bytes or less, so
> > the state doesn't actually include the xstate_header. So
> > validate_xstate_header() was reading out of bounds and seeing invalid values.
> >
> > So I think we need to check use_xsave() here, but it really needs to be in the
> > earlier patch which added the check for just ->xcomp_bv ("x86/fpu: Don't let
> > userspace set bogus xcomp_bv"), not in this one.
> >
> > As far the split of patch 2/3 into these 10 patches, it looks fine (though it
> > suddenly became a *lot* of patches!). One nit: the subject of this one really
> > should say "__fpu__restore_sig()", not "sanitize_restored_xstate()".
> >
> > I can send a fixed series when I have a chance.
>
> Could you please just send the delta patch against the whole tree to fix the bug?
> I'll worry about the patch dependencies and back-merge it to the proper place.
>
The following diff against tip/master fixes the bug. Note: we *could* check
'use_xsave()' instead of 'state_size > offsetof(struct xregs_state, header)',
but that might be confusing in the case where we couldn't find the xstate
information in the memory layout and only copy the fxregs_state, since then we'd
actually be validating the xsave_header which was already there, which shouldn't
ever fail.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
index afe54247cf27..fb639e70048f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
@@ -331,7 +331,8 @@ static int __fpu__restore_sig(void __user *buf, void __user *buf_fx, int size)
err = copy_user_to_xstate(&fpu->state.xsave, buf_fx);
} else {
err = __copy_from_user(&fpu->state.xsave, buf_fx, state_size);
- if (!err)
+
+ if (!err && state_size > offsetof(struct xregs_state, header))
err = validate_xstate_header(&fpu->state.xsave.header);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists