linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 49/77] scsi: sg: off by one in sg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170924203244.779022855@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:32:34 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 49/77] scsi: sg: off by one in sg_ioctl()

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

commit bd46fc406b30d1db1aff8dabaff8d18bb423fdcf upstream.

If "val" is SG_MAX_QUEUE then we are one element beyond the end of the
"rinfo" array so the > should be >=.

Fixes: 109bade9c625 ("scsi: sg: use standard lists for sg_requests")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/scsi/sg.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
@@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ sg_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int
 			read_lock_irqsave(&sfp->rq_list_lock, iflags);
 			val = 0;
 			list_for_each_entry(srp, &sfp->rq_list, entry) {
-				if (val > SG_MAX_QUEUE)
+				if (val >= SG_MAX_QUEUE)
 					break;
 				memset(&rinfo[val], 0, SZ_SG_REQ_INFO);
 				rinfo[val].req_state = srp->done + 1;