[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170924203353.632673504@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:32:34 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 013/109] pinctrl: samsung: Fix invalid register offset used for Exynos5433 external interrupts
4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
commit af0b0baa89953aed07034725023371b2fa50a1e6 upstream.
When setting the pin function for external interrupts, the driver used
wrong IO memory address base. The pin function register is always under
pctl_base, not the eint_base.
By updating wrong register, the external interrupts for chosen GPIO
would not work at all and some other GPIO might be configured to wrong
value. For example on Exynos5433-based boards, the external interrupts
for gpf{1-5}-X GPIOs should not work at all (driver toggled reserved
registers from ALIVE bank instead).
Platforms other than Exynos5433 should not be affected as eint_base
equals pctl_base in such case.
Fixes: 8b1bd11c1f8f ("pinctrl: samsung: Add the support the multiple IORESOURCE_MEM for one pin-bank")
Reported-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Tested-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
@@ -174,10 +174,10 @@ static int exynos_irq_request_resources(
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
- con = readl(bank->eint_base + reg_con);
+ con = readl(bank->pctl_base + reg_con);
con &= ~(mask << shift);
con |= EXYNOS_EINT_FUNC << shift;
- writel(con, bank->eint_base + reg_con);
+ writel(con, bank->pctl_base + reg_con);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
@@ -202,10 +202,10 @@ static void exynos_irq_release_resources
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
- con = readl(bank->eint_base + reg_con);
+ con = readl(bank->pctl_base + reg_con);
con &= ~(mask << shift);
con |= FUNC_INPUT << shift;
- writel(con, bank->eint_base + reg_con);
+ writel(con, bank->pctl_base + reg_con);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists