lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:33:38 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 077/109] tracing: Add barrier to trace_printk() buffer nesting modification

4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

commit 3d9622c12c8873911f4cc0ccdabd0362c2fca06b upstream.

trace_printk() uses 4 buffers, one for each context (normal, softirq, irq
and NMI), such that it does not need to worry about one context preempting
the other. There's a nesting counter that gets incremented to figure out
which buffer to use. If the context gets preempted by another context which
calls trace_printk() it will increment the counter and use the next buffer,
and restore the counter when it is finished.

The problem is that gcc may optimize the modification of the buffer nesting
counter and it may not be incremented in memory before the buffer is used.
If this happens, and the context gets interrupted by another context, it
could pick the same buffer and corrupt the one that is being used.

Compiler barriers need to be added after the nesting variable is incremented
and before it is decremented to prevent usage of the context buffers by more
than one context at the same time.

Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Fixes: e2ace00117 ("tracing: Choose static tp_printk buffer by explicit nesting count")
Hat-tip-to: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/trace/trace.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -2799,11 +2799,17 @@ static char *get_trace_buf(void)
 	if (!buffer || buffer->nesting >= 4)
 		return NULL;
 
-	return &buffer->buffer[buffer->nesting++][0];
+	buffer->nesting++;
+
+	/* Interrupts must see nesting incremented before we use the buffer */
+	barrier();
+	return &buffer->buffer[buffer->nesting][0];
 }
 
 static void put_trace_buf(void)
 {
+	/* Don't let the decrement of nesting leak before this */
+	barrier();
 	this_cpu_dec(trace_percpu_buffer->nesting);
 }
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ