linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.13 051/109] scsi: zfcp: add handling for FCP_RESID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170924203355.135261577@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:33:12 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, "Luke M. Hopkins" <lmhopkin@...ibm.com>,
        Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 051/109] scsi: zfcp: add handling for FCP_RESID_OVER to the fcp ingress path

4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit a099b7b1fc1f0418ab8d79ecf98153e1e134656e upstream.

Up until now zfcp would just ignore the FCP_RESID_OVER flag in the FCP
response IU. When this flag is set, it is possible, in regards to the
FCP standard, that the storage-server processes the command normally, up
to the point where data is missing and simply ignores those.

In this case no CHECK CONDITION would be set, and because we ignored the
FCP_RESID_OVER flag we resulted in at least a data loss or even
-corruption as a follow-up error, depending on how the
applications/layers on top behave. To prevent this, we now set the
host-byte of the corresponding scsi_cmnd to DID_ERROR.

Other storage-behaviors, where the same condition results in a CHECK
CONDITION set in the answer, don't need to be changed as they are
handled in the mid-layer already.

Following is an example trace record decoded with zfcpdbf from the
s390-tools package. We forcefully injected a fc_dl which is one byte too
small:

Timestamp      : ...
Area           : SCSI
Subarea        : 00
Level          : 3
Exception      : -
CPU ID         : ..
Caller         : 0x...
Record ID      : 1
Tag            : rsl_err
Request ID     : 0x...
SCSI ID        : 0x...
SCSI LUN       : 0x...
SCSI result    : 0x00070000
                     ^^DID_ERROR
SCSI retries   : 0x..
SCSI allowed   : 0x..
SCSI scribble  : 0x...
SCSI opcode    : 2a000000 00000000 08000000 00000000
FCP rsp inf cod: 0x00
FCP rsp IU     : 00000000 00000000 00000400 00000001
                                       ^^fr_flags==FCP_RESID_OVER
                                         ^^fr_status==SAM_STAT_GOOD
                                            ^^^^^^^^fr_resid
                 00000000 00000000

As of now, we don't actively handle to possibility that a response IU
has both flags - FCP_RESID_OVER and FCP_RESID_UNDER - set at once.

Reported-by: Luke M. Hopkins <lmhopkin@...ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: 553448f6c483 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Message cleanup")
Fixes: ea127f975424 ("[PATCH] s390 (7/7): zfcp host adapter.") (tglx/history.git)
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.h |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.h
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
  * Fibre Channel related definitions and inline functions for the zfcp
  * device driver
  *
- * Copyright IBM Corp. 2009
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2009, 2017
  */

 #ifndef ZFCP_FC_H
@@ -279,6 +279,10 @@ void zfcp_fc_eval_fcp_rsp(struct fcp_res
 		     !(rsp_flags & FCP_SNS_LEN_VAL) &&
 		     fcp_rsp->resp.fr_status == SAM_STAT_GOOD)
 			set_host_byte(scsi, DID_ERROR);
+	} else if (unlikely(rsp_flags & FCP_RESID_OVER)) {
+		/* FCP_DL was not sufficient for SCSI data length */
+		if (fcp_rsp->resp.fr_status == SAM_STAT_GOOD)
+			set_host_byte(scsi, DID_ERROR);
 	}
 }