lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170924203244.391694292@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:32:24 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 39/77] scsi: zfcp: fix missing trace records for early returns in TMF eh handlers

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit 1a5d999ebfc7bfe28deb48931bb57faa8e4102b6 upstream.

For problem determination we need to see that we were in scsi_eh
as well as whether and why we were successful or not.

The following commits introduced new early returns without adding
a trace record:

v2.6.35 commit a1dbfddd02d2
("[SCSI] zfcp: Pass return code from fc_block_scsi_eh to scsi eh")
on fc_block_scsi_eh() returning != 0 which is FAST_IO_FAIL,

v2.6.30 commit 63caf367e1c9
("[SCSI] zfcp: Improve reliability of SCSI eh handlers in zfcp")
on not having gotten an FSF request after the maximum number of retry
attempts and thus could not issue a TMF and has to return FAILED.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: a1dbfddd02d2 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Pass return code from fc_block_scsi_eh to scsi eh")
Fixes: 63caf367e1c9 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Improve reliability of SCSI eh handlers in zfcp")
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
@@ -273,8 +273,10 @@ static int zfcp_task_mgmt_function(struc
 
 		zfcp_erp_wait(adapter);
 		ret = fc_block_scsi_eh(scpnt);
-		if (ret)
+		if (ret) {
+			zfcp_dbf_scsi_devreset("fiof", scpnt, tm_flags, NULL);
 			return ret;
+		}
 
 		if (!(atomic_read(&adapter->status) &
 		      ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_RUNNING)) {
@@ -282,8 +284,10 @@ static int zfcp_task_mgmt_function(struc
 			return SUCCESS;
 		}
 	}
-	if (!fsf_req)
+	if (!fsf_req) {
+		zfcp_dbf_scsi_devreset("reqf", scpnt, tm_flags, NULL);
 		return FAILED;
+	}
 
 	wait_for_completion(&fsf_req->completion);
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ