[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170925142352.havlx6ikheanqyhj@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:23:52 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.s@...baba-inc.com>
Cc: cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v4] oom: capture unreclaimable slab info in oom
message when kernel panic
On Thu 21-09-17 06:38:50, Yang Shi wrote:
> Recently we ran into a oom issue, kernel panic due to no killable process.
> The dmesg shows huge unreclaimable slabs used almost 100% memory, but kdump doesn't capture vmcore due to some reason.
>
> So, it may sound better to capture unreclaimable slab info in oom message when kernel panic to aid trouble shooting and cover the corner case.
> Since kernel already panic, so capturing more information sounds worthy and doesn't bother normal oom killer.
>
> With the patchset, tools/vm/slabinfo has a new option, "-U", to show unreclaimable slab only.
>
> And, oom will print all non zero (num_objs * size != 0) unreclaimable slabs in oom killer message.
Well, I do undestand that this _might_ be useful but it also might
generates a _lot_ of output. The oom report can be quite verbose already
so is this something we want to have enabled by default?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists